You
know how bad things come in threes? They say they do anyway. It’s a
superstition, but it persists. Interesting and good things can come in
threes too, at least we notice them that way. In this case, the triple
whammy I’m referring to is about Chrysanthemum.
First, I have books out there but people persist in not leaving a review. It’s partially my fault, I beg for a review after
the ‘See Also’ page at the end of the book, and most people tune out
right about there. Sigh. I wasn’t thinking. Anyway, I submitted the book
to a review site to at least get something, although it didn’t make it
all the way to Amazon. I’ll get back to that.
While I was waiting
for that review, I went searching for some files I knew I had from back
in 2010 and stumbled across the original rough draft for Chrysanthemum. I
mean the really original manuscript, when that wasn’t even her name,
and it wasn’t written from her point of view, and boy is it rough.
I
went tripping down memory lane. I had completely forgotten about this.
It was mostly from Marcus’s point of view – wow. Okay, now there’s
nothing wrong with writing from the viewpoint of a hunky master vampire,
but I’m glad I changed it.
Quick lesson about writing: in books
where you have multiple viewpoints as an option: write the scene from
the viewpoint of the character with the most at stake. In a book with
one point of view, such as Chrysanthemum, pick the character
with the most to lose or gain. That’s the character the reader will
become invested in and you want to take the reader on an emotional
journey.
There’s no doubt Marcus has a lot at stake. I mean this
is his soul mate someone’s trying to kidnap, and it’s probably because
of him (not much of a spoiler there, don’t worry). But Chrys still has a
lot more going on. Besides, being inside her head is fun.
Marcus is all-powerful and hunky and all that, but face it, there are
enough vampire books out there to wallpaper the White House ten times
over. Being in his head makes this just another vamp book. It’s Chrys’s
viewpoint on the situation that makes it unique. And because I wrote it
from her point of view and, more importantly, first person, ‘her voice’
comes through which really made her character shine.
And that’s pretty much what the review said. You can read it here.
What it also pointed out is that I really need to define my blurb
better, and that I don’t like my cover. No, she didn’t say anything
about my cover. I decided that on my own. Again. Oddly, this book was
pushed back from publication several times and delayed months because I
kept not liking the cover. I finally caved and said, “yeah, sure, fine,
that’ll work,” and released it. Now I changed my mind again. I’m not
sure how this is going to work because I’m not working with that
designer anymore. Sigh. Enough about that.
Not sure about point of
view, perspective, and voice? Yeah, it can be a mess sometimes. Point
of view I sort of covered – write from the point of view aka the eyes of
the character who has the most to gain or lose. Unless you have a
narrator or other really compelling reason.
Perspective – that’s
first person or third person. Second isn’t really used. First person is:
“I went to the sink to get a glass of water.” Second person is: “You go
to the sink to get a glass of water.” Think of the ‘choose your own
adventure’ books, they use this. Third person is: “She went to the sink
to get a glass of water.”
Why use one over another? Preference.
Some writers can’t write first or third so they really only write one
way. That neatly solves that problem. If you’re not trapped in that
mindset, look at your book. First person perspective doesn’t completely
trap you in the mind of one character like I did in Chrysanthemum. Yes, you’re in her mind the entire book. It’s common. It’s not a requirement. Shiver
by Maggie Stiefvater is also written in first person perspective, but
it switches between two characters – each chapter is from their eyes.
First
person means the reader only knows what that character knows, what they
see, hear, feel, and think, and they can feel a deeper connection with
the character. It means they miss things, and they can be surprised. It
also allows you to play with a technique called ‘stream of
consciousness’ which is fun. I use it in Chrysanthemum, and Robin McKinley does it beautifully in Sunshine
(another vampire book, one of my favorites). Basically, this is where
you write as people actually think – not linear and organized as we
might talk, but a little more erratic. Our thoughts wander slightly, and
it shows. And it’s fun. Don’t get out of hand, obviously.
With
third person, you have the option of easily handling point of views of
multiple characters. I used this for the Lexi Frost series for this
reason. In one scene, you’re in Teri’s head, then Dev’s, then Flynn’s,
then back to Teri’s, then jump to Kenny’s viewpoint to see that everyone
involved is missing something important, and so on. It lets the reader
know things the key characters don’t. The reader knows there’s trouble
coming and they’re on the edge of their seat waiting for the shoe to
drop.
Past tense vs present tense is a debate I’m probably better
not entering. I’m old school. Unless it’s a middle grade book – use past
tense. There, I said it. For adult books, when I see present tense, I
think “this person reads to their kids a lot, that’s nice,” and then I
tend to put it down. It’s really hard to get continuity right with
present tense. So many paragraphs tend to read literally impossible. But
that’s me. And I’m recovering, my daughter makes me read to her, so
yes, I’ve read a lot of the hot YA books that are present tense. I even
ground my teeth, shredded my stress ball, and made my way through the 50
Shades of hell and didn’t pick it apart too much. The books, not the
ball – it didn’t make it. On the plus side: I enjoyed the sex scenes and
learned I will not be writing BDSM.
And lastly, voice. This is a
vague concept. The voice is the personality of your book, your writing,
showing through. If you’re naturally snarky, your writing might reflect
that even if you didn’t design any of your characters to be snarky.
Personally, I think voice shows through a lot more when you’re either in
first person point of view, or third person limited – meaning you’re
not hopping around between eight different characters. The fewer the
characters the reader has to get to know, the more they can get to know
them, and you – and your voice. If you have a good voice, this is a good
strategy. A good story helps, obviously, but readers like writers who
draw them in and showing a good voice is a way to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment